Many institutions, different meters and bills
Institutional and portfolio-level energy overview
Municipal energy monitoring and DIMOP-based digitization
Public institutions, city assets, energy and tasks in a single, gradually expandable system.
Typical starting points01 02 03
We fix the operational question before the technology.
Manual data request and slow executive aggregation
Connecting measurement, account and building data
Difficult sustainability of tender developments
A deviation is a task, a responsible and measured result
What and where is it worth measuring?
Municipal energy supervision with comparable institutions
In a municipal portfolio, the school, kindergarten, doctor's office, sports facility and office operate with different operating hours and technical conditions. Collecting the invoices is only the first step: institutions must be made comparable according to floor space, opening hours, weather and function, otherwise the largest consumer is not necessarily the worst-performing building.
- electricity, gas, heat and water meters in the institutional hierarchy
- connection of invoice, contract, tariff and measurement point
- floor area, opening hours, utilization and weather data
- condition of boiler houses, solar systems and significant consumers
- institutional managers, alerts and verified measures
Illustrative numerical example
Let's say that the annual gas consumption of two similar-sized schools is 180 and 145 kWh/m². This does not prove a mistake: one building may stay open longer, the demand for domestic hot water or the state of renovation may differ. In the pilot, in addition to the monthly invoices, daily measurements, outside temperature and operating time are added. In this way, for example, weekend heating or unnecessary nighttime basic consumption can be identified.
The example is not an offer, a promise of savings or a general compliance requirement; the final technical solution is determined by the on-site and process survey.
Decision, audit and operational context
A repeatable calculation, source identification and documented change management are required for applications and management reports. The system does not replace the energy expert or the examination of application compliance; it provides an organized database from which measures, investment priorities and follow-up can be checked.
How does that make an acceptable pilot?
For the introduction, an institutional portfolio map is prepared with measurement points, account relationships and responsible persons. We do not necessarily choose the largest building for the pilot, but a group of institutions where the rules of comparison and responsibility for measures can be tested. We record extraordinary opening hours, renovations and changes in function so that they do not automatically appear as losses. Part of the acceptance is a management portfolio view and an institutional work process: the deviation should be responsible, explained, acted upon and followed up. This can be used to create an authentic investment sequence, not just a consumption top list.
What does the pilot deliver?
- institution-meter-contract map
- normalized institutional comparison
- closed energy deviation process
- executive report sample
- investment priority list
What is included in the first step?
In the first phase, the following two areas will be audited: electricity, gas, heat and water meters in the institutional hierarchy and the assignment of invoices, contracts, tariffs and metering points. Connecting all sites, devices and historical data at the same time is not the goal. First, we verify that a reliable decision and a work process that can be closed are made from the selected data. To finalize the scope, two questions are particularly important: Which institutions have daily or hourly measurement data? What management and application reports are actually needed? The answers determine the device count, integration task, local data storage, roles, and acceptance test.
First 90 days1–15. sun 16–45. sun 46–75. sun 76–90. sun
Measurable pilot, evidence-based next step.
Site assessment
Locations, data sources, responsible persons and success criteria.
Connection
Controlled connection of designated measurement points and systems.
Process
Dashboard, alert and at least one actionable workflow.
Evaluation
Result, list of deficiencies and quantifiable expansion proposal.
What do you get at the end of the pilot?
- Documented data source and connection map
- Working limited pilot environment
- Coordinated alert and liability process
- Measurement result and decision summary
- The basis for the technical and budget of the next phase
The first step is not a complete system introduction.
During a short technical consultation, we select the measurement or operating point at which the value of the pilot can be checked.
Pilot consultation