Construction industry project and field digitization

Schedule, technical document, site event and cost linked to the same project.

Typical starting points

We fix the operational question before the technology.

01

Documents that live in multiple versions

Linking task, responsible person, deadline and location

02

On-the-spot changes reach the decision-maker late

Field recording and controlled document library

03

Difference between schedule and actual readiness

Milestone, cost and variance tracking

What and where is it worth measuring?

Digital construction trail from design to handover

In a construction project, it is not the lack of data, but the scattering of versions, responsible persons and evidence that causes the most controversy. The plan, location, task, photo, minutes and approval can be used if they are related to the same work part and time, can also be recorded on a mobile phone and retrieved later.

  • task structure according to location, level, room and work area
  • design and document version, comment and approval status
  • mobile walkthrough, checklist, photo and on-site signature
  • deadline, responsible, obstacle and dependency in the implementation schedule
  • handover error tickets, corrections and closing proofs
OrigSmart platform – Digitális építési nyomvonal a tervtől az átadásig
Digital construction trail from design to handover

Illustrative numerical example

For an 80-room handover, six inspection points per room already mean 480 items. If there are two photos, a person responsible and a deadline for each error, the current status is quickly lost in the table. The pilot shows at a designated level how the open, corrected and reviewed items are separated and how long it takes from recording to closing.

The example is not an offer, a promise of savings or a general compliance requirement; the final technical solution is determined by the on-site and process survey.

Decision, audit and operational context

The value of a digital trail is in version identity and authorization. A photo is only evidence if the time, place, related task and uploader of it are known. The BIM model can be a navigation and context layer, but the daily construction process should not be tied to the detail of the model.

How does that make an acceptable pilot?

For the introduction, we designate a delimitable work area and create a uniform location identification. Roles, task statuses, required evidence and approval points are recorded before the first mobile walkthrough. Real errors or inspection items run from capture to correction to re-inspection. We measure the turnaround time, the number of re-openings and incomplete closures separately. Upon acceptance, the handover status, documents and open items of the selected area should be checked from a single view, with an exportable trace. This will reveal whether the method can be sustained for a larger part of the project.

What does the pilot deliver?

  • location and workpiece identification
  • mobile checklist
  • approval and review process
  • run-through and reopening indicator
  • exportable transfer item list

What is included in the first step?

In the first phase, the following two areas will be inspected: task structure according to location, level, room and work part, and plan and document version, comments and approval status. The goal is not to connect all sites, devices and historical data at the same time. First, we verify that a reliable decision and a work process that can be closed are made from the selected data. To finalize the scope, two questions are particularly important: Which part of the work causes the most retrieval time today? Which documents are included in the transfer package? The answers determine the device count, integration task, local data storage, roles, and acceptance test.

Questions that we record on the survey

  • Which part of work causes the most retrieval time today?
  • What should be the common system of location and task identification?
  • Who needs to approve or review the closing?
  • Which documents are included in the transfer package?

Related content

Related industry solutions

Industrial IoT and manufacturing energy monitoring — OrigSmartTenant sub-metering and transparent billing and allocation — OrigSmart
First 90 days

Measurable pilot, evidence-based next step.

1–15. sun

Site assessment

Locations, data sources, responsible persons and success criteria.

16–45. sun

Connection

Controlled connection of designated measurement points and systems.

46–75. sun

Process

Dashboard, alert and at least one actionable workflow.

76–90. sun

Evaluation

Result, list of deficiencies and quantifiable expansion proposal.

What do you get at the end of the pilot?

  • Documented data source and connection map
  • Working limited pilot environment
  • Coordinated alert and liability process
  • Measurement result and decision summary
  • The basis for the technical and budget of the next phase

The first step is not a complete system introduction.

During a short technical consultation, we select the measurement or operating point at which the value of the pilot can be checked.

Pilot consultation